Côte d’Ivoire vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Political Stability/No Violence
Political Stability/No Violence over time
- Côte d’Ivoire
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Côte d’Ivoire currently reports 0.2429 standard error against 0.2429 standard error in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0 standard error.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
Côte d’Ivoire ranks 32nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d’Ivoire | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3496 standard error | 0.3496 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
| 2000s | 0.2783 standard error | 0.2816 standard error | 0.0032 standard error | Tanzania, United Republic of |
| 2010s | 0.2395 standard error | 0.2395 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability/no violence, Côte d’Ivoire or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Côte d’Ivoire, at 0.2429 standard error against 0.2429 standard error in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2011.
- What is the difference in political stability/no violence between Côte d’Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0 standard error, with Côte d’Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d’Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Côte d’Ivoire and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for political stability/no violence?
- Côte d’Ivoire ranks 32nd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Political Stability/No Violence (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.POLI.ST.SD. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.