Chad vs Togo: Political Stability/No Violence

Chad
0.255 standard error
in 2011
Togo
0.2491 standard error
in 2011
Chad rank
21st
Togo rank
24th

Political Stability/No Violence over time

  • Chad
  • Togo
00.10.20.30.40.5199620032011

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.255 standard error against 0.2491 standard error in Togo, a difference of 0.0059 standard error.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 21st and Togo ranks 24th of 53 countries.

Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Togo Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4645 standard error 0.4067 standard error 0.0578 standard error Chad
2000s 0.3243 standard error 0.3159 standard error 0.0084 standard error Chad
2010s 0.2508 standard error 0.2461 standard error 0.0047 standard error Chad

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability/no violence, Chad or Togo?
Chad, at 0.255 standard error against 0.2491 standard error in Togo as of 2011.
What is the difference in political stability/no violence between Chad and Togo?
0.0059 standard error, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Togo?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Chad and Togo rank globally for political stability/no violence?
Chad ranks 21st and Togo ranks 24th of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Political Stability/No Violence (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability/No Violence (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.POLI.ST.SD. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.