Chad vs Mauritania: Political Stability/No Violence

Chad
0.255 standard error
in 2011
Mauritania
0.255 standard error
in 2011
Chad rank
21st
Mauritania rank
21st

Political Stability/No Violence over time

  • Chad
  • Mauritania
00.10.20.30.40.5199620032011

How they compare

Chad currently reports 0.255 standard error against 0.255 standard error in Mauritania, a difference of 0 standard error.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Mauritania has been ahead every year.

Chad ranks 21st and Mauritania ranks 21st of 53 countries.

Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Mauritania Difference Ahead
1990s 0.4645 standard error 0.4645 standard error 0 standard error
2000s 0.3243 standard error 0.3382 standard error 0.0139 standard error Mauritania
2010s 0.2508 standard error 0.2508 standard error 0 standard error

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability/no violence, Chad or Mauritania?
Chad, at 0.255 standard error against 0.255 standard error in Mauritania as of 2011.
What is the difference in political stability/no violence between Chad and Mauritania?
0 standard error, with Chad ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mauritania?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Chad and Mauritania rank globally for political stability/no violence?
Chad ranks 21st and Mauritania ranks 21st of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Political Stability/No Violence (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability/No Violence (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.POLI.ST.SD. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.