Central African Republic vs Mauritania: Political Stability/No Violence
Political Stability/No Violence over time
- Central African Republic
- Mauritania
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 0.2622 standard error against 0.255 standard error in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0072 standard error.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritania ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 19th and Mauritania ranks 21st of 53 groups.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4645 standard error | 0.4645 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
| 2000s | 0.3561 standard error | 0.3382 standard error | 0.0179 standard error | Central African Republic |
| 2010s | 0.2585 standard error | 0.2508 standard error | 0.0077 standard error | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability/no violence, Central African Republic or Mauritania?
- Central African Republic, at 0.2622 standard error against 0.255 standard error in Mauritania as of 2011.
- What is the difference in political stability/no violence between Central African Republic and Mauritania?
- 0.0072 standard error, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Mauritania?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Central African Republic and Mauritania rank globally for political stability/no violence?
- Central African Republic ranks 19th and Mauritania ranks 21st of 53 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Political Stability/No Violence (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.POLI.ST.SD. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.