Botswana vs Tunisia: Political Stability/No Violence
Botswana
0.2429 standard error
in 2011
Tunisia
0.2429 standard error
in 2011
Botswana rank
32nd
Tunisia rank
32nd
Political Stability/No Violence over time
- Botswana
- Tunisia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 0.2429 standard error against 0.2429 standard error in Tunisia, a difference of 0 standard error.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Tunisia ahead.
Botswana ranks 32nd and Tunisia ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.3496 standard error | 0.3496 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
| 2000s | 0.2752 standard error | 0.2722 standard error | 0.0029 standard error | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0.2395 standard error | 0.2395 standard error | 0 standard error | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability/no violence, Botswana or Tunisia?
- Botswana, at 0.2429 standard error against 0.2429 standard error in Tunisia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in political stability/no violence between Botswana and Tunisia?
- 0 standard error, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Tunisia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Botswana and Tunisia rank globally for political stability/no violence?
- Botswana ranks 32nd and Tunisia ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Political Stability/No Violence (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
See definition GV.POLI.ST.SD. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.