Botswana vs Egypt: Political Stability/No Violence

Botswana
0.2429 standard error
in 2011
Egypt
0.2429 standard error
in 2011
Botswana rank
32nd
Egypt rank
32nd

Political Stability/No Violence over time

  • Botswana
  • Egypt
00.10.20.30.4199620032011

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.2429 standard error against 0.2429 standard error in Egypt, a difference of 0 standard error.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Egypt ahead.

Botswana ranks 32nd and Egypt ranks 32nd of 53 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Egypt Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3496 standard error 0.3496 standard error 0 standard error
2000s 0.2752 standard error 0.2738 standard error 0.0013 standard error Botswana
2010s 0.2395 standard error 0.2395 standard error 0 standard error

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability/no violence, Botswana or Egypt?
Botswana, at 0.2429 standard error against 0.2429 standard error in Egypt as of 2011.
What is the difference in political stability/no violence between Botswana and Egypt?
0 standard error, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Egypt?
13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
How do Botswana and Egypt rank globally for political stability/no violence?
Botswana ranks 32nd and Egypt ranks 32nd of 53 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank Institute, published as Political Stability/No Violence (standard error). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability/No Violence (standard error)
Unit
standard error
Source
World Bank Institute
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
53 places, 689 data points, 1996–2011
Last refreshed

See definition GV.POLI.ST.SD. Inherent to all Governance Indicators is a margin of error, which might vary from country to country, normally attributable to two factors: (i) cross-country differences in the number of sources in which a country appears, and (ii) differences in the precision of the sources in which each country appears.