Mauritania vs Zimbabwe: Political Stability/No Violence
Mauritania
-1.19
in 2011
Zimbabwe
-1.04
in 2011
Mauritania rank
40th
Zimbabwe rank
38th
Political Stability/No Violence over time
- Mauritania
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports -1.04 against -1.19 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.15.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritania ahead.
Mauritania ranks 40th and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritania | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2536 | -0.7134 | 0.967 | Mauritania |
| 2000s | -0.1516 | -1.22 | 1.07 | Mauritania |
| 2010s | -1.21 | -1.11 | 0.0945 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability/no violence, Mauritania or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at -1.04 against -1.19 in Mauritania as of 2011.
- What is the difference in political stability/no violence between Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
- 0.15, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Zimbabwe?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Mauritania and Zimbabwe rank globally for political stability/no violence?
- Mauritania ranks 40th and Zimbabwe ranks 38th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Political Stability/No Violence (estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political stability and absence of violence measures the perceptions of the likelihood that the government will be destabilized or overthrown by unconstitutional or violent means, including domestic violence or terrorism. Further documentation and research using the World Governance Indicators (WGI) is available at www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance.