Botswana vs Mauritius: Political Stability/No Violence
Political Stability/No Violence over time
- Botswana
- Mauritius
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 1.04 against 0.8759 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.1641.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritius ahead.
Botswana ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 4th of 53 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8974 | 0.9964 | 0.099 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0.9356 | 0.875 | 0.0607 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 0.9973 | 0.7075 | 0.2898 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability/no violence, Botswana or Mauritius?
- Botswana, at 1.04 against 0.8759 in Mauritius as of 2011.
- What is the difference in political stability/no violence between Botswana and Mauritius?
- 0.1641, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Mauritius?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2011.
- How do Botswana and Mauritius rank globally for political stability/no violence?
- Botswana ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 4th of 53 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank Institute, published as Political Stability/No Violence (estimate). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political stability and absence of violence measures the perceptions of the likelihood that the government will be destabilized or overthrown by unconstitutional or violent means, including domestic violence or terrorism. Further documentation and research using the World Governance Indicators (WGI) is available at www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance.