Poland vs East Timor: Political Stability - Governance score (0-100) (Political score 0-100)
Political Stability - Governance score (0-100) (Political score 0-100) over time
- Poland
- East Timor
How they compare
Poland currently reports 77.76 0-100 against 76.92 0-100 in East Timor, a difference of 0.84 0-100.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Poland ranks 66th and East Timor ranks 69th of 208 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 76.39 0-100 | 53.59 0-100 | 22.8 0-100 | Poland |
| 2010s | 80.8 0-100 | 61.03 0-100 | 19.76 0-100 | Poland |
| 2020s | 75.83 0-100 | 72.59 0-100 | 3.24 0-100 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance score, Poland or East Timor?
- Poland, at 77.76 0-100 against 76.92 0-100 in East Timor as of 2025.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance score between Poland and East Timor?
- 0.84 0-100, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and East Timor?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Poland and East Timor rank globally for political stability - governance score?
- Poland ranks 66th and East Timor ranks 69th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).