Malaysia vs New Caledonia: Political Stability - Governance score (0-100) (Political score 0-100)
Political Stability - Governance score (0-100) (Political score 0-100) over time
- Malaysia
- New Caledonia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 71.56 0-100 against 70.73 0-100 in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.83 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2018 it was New Caledonia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 88th and New Caledonia ranks 91st of 208 countries.
New Caledonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 68.16 0-100 | 83.16 0-100 | 15 0-100 | New Caledonia |
| 2020s | 69.86 0-100 | 79.41 0-100 | 9.54 0-100 | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance score, Malaysia or New Caledonia?
- Malaysia, at 71.56 0-100 against 70.73 0-100 in New Caledonia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance score between Malaysia and New Caledonia?
- 0.83 0-100, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and New Caledonia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2025.
- How do Malaysia and New Caledonia rank globally for political stability - governance score?
- Malaysia ranks 88th and New Caledonia ranks 91st of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).