Malawi vs Nepal: Political Stability - Governance score
Political Stability - Governance score over time
- Malawi
- Nepal
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 59.4 0-100 against 58.81 0-100 in Nepal, a difference of 0.59 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Nepal ahead.
Malawi ranks 137th and Nepal ranks 140th of 206 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 56.19 0-100 | 54.62 0-100 | 1.58 0-100 | Malawi |
| 2000s | 62.9 0-100 | 33.88 0-100 | 29.02 0-100 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 62.75 0-100 | 48.72 0-100 | 14.03 0-100 | Malawi |
| 2020s | 62.58 0-100 | 60.41 0-100 | 2.17 0-100 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance score, Malawi or Nepal?
- Malawi, at 59.4 0-100 against 58.81 0-100 in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance score between Malawi and Nepal?
- 0.59 0-100, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Nepal?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Nepal rank globally for political stability - governance score?
- Malawi ranks 137th and Nepal ranks 140th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).