Libya vs Nigeria: Political Stability - Governance score
Political Stability - Governance score over time
- Libya
- Nigeria
How they compare
Libya currently reports 33.5 0-100 against 31.69 0-100 in Nigeria, a difference of 1.81 0-100.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Nigeria's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 195th and Nigeria ranks 197th of 207 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 3 and Nigeria in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 53.19 0-100 | 44.97 0-100 | 8.22 0-100 | Libya |
| 2000s | 68.28 0-100 | 36.24 0-100 | 32.03 0-100 | Libya |
| 2010s | 33.16 0-100 | 32.79 0-100 | 0.3738 0-100 | Libya |
| 2020s | 30.46 0-100 | 31.96 0-100 | 1.5 0-100 | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance score, Libya or Nigeria?
- Libya, at 33.5 0-100 against 31.69 0-100 in Nigeria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance score between Libya and Nigeria?
- 1.81 0-100, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Nigeria?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Libya and Nigeria rank globally for political stability - governance score?
- Libya ranks 195th and Nigeria ranks 197th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).