Lebanon vs South Sudan: Political Stability - Governance score
Political Stability - Governance score over time
- Lebanon
- South Sudan
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 42.16 0-100 against 40.45 0-100 in South Sudan, a difference of 1.71 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Lebanon ahead.
Lebanon ranks 182nd and South Sudan ranks 184th of 206 countries.
Lebanon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lebanon | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 41.67 0-100 | 29.15 0-100 | 12.52 0-100 | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 43.07 0-100 | 35.19 0-100 | 7.88 0-100 | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance score, Lebanon or South Sudan?
- Lebanon, at 42.16 0-100 against 40.45 0-100 in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance score between Lebanon and South Sudan?
- 1.71 0-100, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Lebanon and South Sudan rank globally for political stability - governance score?
- Lebanon ranks 182nd and South Sudan ranks 184th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).