Iceland vs Tonga: Political Stability - Governance score (0-100) (Political score 0-100)
Political Stability - Governance score (0-100) (Political score 0-100) over time
- Iceland
- Tonga
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 88.76 0-100 against 88.64 0-100 in Tonga, a difference of 0.12 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 13th and Tonga ranks 14th of 208 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 89.34 0-100 | 74.04 0-100 | 15.3 0-100 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 87.67 0-100 | 81.3 0-100 | 6.36 0-100 | Iceland |
| 2020s | 87.91 0-100 | 87.37 0-100 | 0.5352 0-100 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance score, Iceland or Tonga?
- Iceland, at 88.76 0-100 against 88.64 0-100 in Tonga as of 2025.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance score between Iceland and Tonga?
- 0.12 0-100, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Tonga?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Tonga rank globally for political stability - governance score?
- Iceland ranks 13th and Tonga ranks 14th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).