Guam vs Nauru: Political Stability - Governance score (0-100) (Political score 0-100)
Political Stability - Governance score (0-100) (Political score 0-100) over time
- Guam
- Nauru
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 86.95 0-100 against 86.48 0-100 in Guam, a difference of 0.47 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Nauru ahead.
Guam ranks 28th and Nauru ranks 25th of 208 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 1 and Nauru in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Nauru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.57 0-100 | 84.55 0-100 | 9.99 0-100 | Nauru |
| 2010s | 79.05 0-100 | 86.86 0-100 | 7.8 0-100 | Nauru |
| 2020s | 83.59 0-100 | 82.87 0-100 | 0.7204 0-100 | Guam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance score, Guam or Nauru?
- Nauru, at 86.95 0-100 against 86.48 0-100 in Guam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance score between Guam and Nauru?
- 0.47 0-100, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Nauru?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
- How do Guam and Nauru rank globally for political stability - governance score?
- Guam ranks 28th and Nauru ranks 25th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).