Croatia vs Sweden: Political Stability - Governance score
Political Stability - Governance score over time
- Croatia
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 76.2 0-100 against 75.83 0-100 in Croatia, a difference of 0.37 0-100.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Croatia ranks 68th and Sweden ranks 65th of 206 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 64.39 0-100 | 92.22 0-100 | 27.83 0-100 | Sweden |
| 2000s | 76.79 0-100 | 87.79 0-100 | 11 0-100 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 77.45 0-100 | 83.07 0-100 | 5.61 0-100 | Sweden |
| 2020s | 77.1 0-100 | 80.34 0-100 | 3.23 0-100 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance score, Croatia or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 76.2 0-100 against 75.83 0-100 in Croatia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance score between Croatia and Sweden?
- 0.37 0-100, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Sweden?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Croatia and Sweden rank globally for political stability - governance score?
- Croatia ranks 68th and Sweden ranks 65th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).