Croatia vs Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Political Stability - Governance score

Croatia
75.83 0-100
in 2024
Lao People’s Democratic Republic
75.42 0-100
in 2024
Croatia rank
68th
Lao People’s Democratic Republic rank
69th

Political Stability - Governance score over time

  • Croatia
  • Lao People’s Democratic Republic
020406080199620102024

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 75.83 0-100 against 75.42 0-100 in Lao People’s Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.41 0-100.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Lao People’s Democratic Republic ahead.

Croatia ranks 68th and Lao People’s Democratic Republic ranks 69th of 206 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Lao People’s Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
1990s 64.39 0-100 63.87 0-100 0.5196 0-100 Croatia
2000s 76.79 0-100 60.43 0-100 16.36 0-100 Croatia
2010s 77.45 0-100 68.65 0-100 8.81 0-100 Croatia
2020s 77.1 0-100 76.58 0-100 0.5242 0-100 Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance score, Croatia or Lao People’s Democratic Republic?
Croatia, at 75.83 0-100 against 75.42 0-100 in Lao People’s Democratic Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in political stability - governance score between Croatia and Lao People’s Democratic Republic?
0.41 0-100, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Lao People’s Democratic Republic?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Croatia and Lao People’s Democratic Republic rank globally for political stability - governance score?
Croatia ranks 68th and Lao People’s Democratic Republic ranks 69th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Political Stability - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-score-0-100/croatia/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-score-0-100/croatia/lao-pdr/">Croatia vs Lao People’s Democratic Republic: Political Stability - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,229 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).