Central African Republic vs Palestine, State of: Political Stability - Governance score

Central African Republic
34.58 0-100
in 2024
Palestine, State of
33.84 0-100
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
192nd
Palestine, State of rank
193rd

Political Stability - Governance score over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Palestine, State of
01020304050199620102024

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports 34.58 0-100 against 33.84 0-100 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.74 0-100.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Palestine, State of ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 192nd and Palestine, State of ranks 193rd of 207 countries.

Palestine, State of has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
1990s 34.06 0-100 35.55 0-100 1.49 0-100 Palestine, State of
2000s 37.49 0-100 37.69 0-100 0.2008 0-100 Palestine, State of
2010s 33.52 0-100 37.11 0-100 3.59 0-100 Palestine, State of
2020s 31.36 0-100 37.19 0-100 5.84 0-100 Palestine, State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance score, Central African Republic or Palestine, State of?
Central African Republic, at 34.58 0-100 against 33.84 0-100 in Palestine, State of as of 2024.
What is the difference in political stability - governance score between Central African Republic and Palestine, State of?
0.74 0-100, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Palestine, State of?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Central African Republic and Palestine, State of rank globally for political stability - governance score?
Central African Republic ranks 192nd and Palestine, State of ranks 193rd of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Palestine, State of: Political Stability - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-score-0-100/central-african-republic/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-score-0-100/central-african-republic/west-bank-and-gaza/">Central African Republic vs Palestine, State of: Political Stability - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,252 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).