Cape Verde vs South Korea: Political Stability - Governance score (0-100) (Political score 0-100)

Cape Verde
80.66 0-100
in 2025
South Korea
81.68 0-100
in 2025
Cape Verde rank
52nd
South Korea rank
49th

Political Stability - Governance score (0-100) (Political score 0-100) over time

  • Cape Verde
  • South Korea
020406080199620102025

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 81.68 0-100 against 80.66 0-100 in Cape Verde, a difference of 1.02 0-100.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 52nd and South Korea ranks 49th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 3 and South Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde South Korea Difference Ahead
1990s 85.01 0-100 76.11 0-100 8.9 0-100 Cape Verde
2000s 81.95 0-100 75.08 0-100 6.87 0-100 Cape Verde
2010s 80.03 0-100 76.17 0-100 3.85 0-100 Cape Verde
2020s 80.35 0-100 80.59 0-100 0.2493 0-100 South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance score, Cape Verde or South Korea?
South Korea, at 81.68 0-100 against 80.66 0-100 in Cape Verde as of 2025.
What is the difference in political stability - governance score between Cape Verde and South Korea?
1.02 0-100, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and South Korea?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Cape Verde and South Korea rank globally for political stability - governance score?
Cape Verde ranks 52nd and South Korea ranks 49th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs South Korea: Political Stability - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-score-0-100/cabo-verde/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-score-0-100/cabo-verde/korea-rep/">Cape Verde vs South Korea: Political Stability - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,485 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).