Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kyrgyzstan: Political Stability - Governance score

Bosnia and Herzegovina
57.34 0-100
in 2024
Kyrgyzstan
57.28 0-100
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
146th
Kyrgyzstan rank
147th

Political Stability - Governance score over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Kyrgyzstan
0204060199620102024

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 57.34 0-100 against 57.28 0-100 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.06 0-100.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 146th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 147th of 207 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 3 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1990s 52.97 0-100 57.33 0-100 4.37 0-100 Kyrgyzstan
2000s 57.65 0-100 50.4 0-100 7.25 0-100 Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 59.16 0-100 54.89 0-100 4.27 0-100 Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 60.67 0-100 57.93 0-100 2.74 0-100 Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Kyrgyzstan?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 57.34 0-100 against 57.28 0-100 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
What is the difference in political stability - governance score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kyrgyzstan?
0.06 0-100, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kyrgyzstan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for political stability - governance score?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 146th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 147th of 207 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kyrgyzstan: Political Stability - Governance score. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-score-0-100/bosnia-and-herzegovina/kyrgyz-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-score-0-100/bosnia-and-herzegovina/kyrgyz-republic/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Kyrgyzstan: Political Stability - Governance score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance score (0-100)
Unit
0-100
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 5,252 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).