Bhutan vs Uruguay: Political Stability - Governance score
Political Stability - Governance score over time
- Bhutan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Bhutan currently reports 89.02 0-100 against 87.72 0-100 in Uruguay, a difference of 1.3 0-100.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Uruguay ahead.
Bhutan ranks 6th and Uruguay ranks 8th of 206 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 72.49 0-100 | 78.4 0-100 | 5.91 0-100 | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 78.7 0-100 | 80.69 0-100 | 1.99 0-100 | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 82.49 0-100 | 83.52 0-100 | 1.03 0-100 | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 86.61 0-100 | 86.61 0-100 | 0.0015 0-100 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance score, Bhutan or Uruguay?
- Bhutan, at 89.02 0-100 against 87.72 0-100 in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance score between Bhutan and Uruguay?
- 1.3 0-100, with Bhutan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Uruguay?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Bhutan and Uruguay rank globally for political stability - governance score?
- Bhutan ranks 6th and Uruguay ranks 8th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).