Bhutan vs Tuvalu: Political Stability - Governance score (0-100) (Political score 0-100)
Political Stability - Governance score (0-100) (Political score 0-100) over time
- Bhutan
- Tuvalu
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports 90.53 0-100 against 90.02 0-100 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.51 0-100.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Tuvalu has been ahead every year.
Bhutan ranks 10th and Tuvalu ranks 8th of 208 countries.
Tuvalu has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bhutan | Tuvalu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 80.04 0-100 | 87.56 0-100 | 7.53 0-100 | Tuvalu |
| 2010s | 82.47 0-100 | 90.22 0-100 | 7.75 0-100 | Tuvalu |
| 2020s | 87.33 0-100 | 90.25 0-100 | 2.93 0-100 | Tuvalu |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance score, Bhutan or Tuvalu?
- Tuvalu, at 90.53 0-100 against 90.02 0-100 in Bhutan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance score between Bhutan and Tuvalu?
- 0.51 0-100, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Tuvalu?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2025.
- How do Bhutan and Tuvalu rank globally for political stability - governance score?
- Bhutan ranks 10th and Tuvalu ranks 8th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).