Benin vs Malawi: Political Stability - Governance score
Political Stability - Governance score over time
- Benin
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 59.4 0-100 against 59.01 0-100 in Benin, a difference of 0.39 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Benin ahead.
Benin ranks 139th and Malawi ranks 137th of 206 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Benin averaged higher in 3 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Benin | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 77.98 0-100 | 56.19 0-100 | 21.78 0-100 | Benin |
| 2000s | 74.27 0-100 | 62.9 0-100 | 11.37 0-100 | Benin |
| 2010s | 69.52 0-100 | 62.75 0-100 | 6.76 0-100 | Benin |
| 2020s | 59.6 0-100 | 62.58 0-100 | 2.99 0-100 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance score, Benin or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 59.4 0-100 against 59.01 0-100 in Benin as of 2024.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance score between Benin and Malawi?
- 0.39 0-100, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Malawi?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Benin and Malawi rank globally for political stability - governance score?
- Benin ranks 139th and Malawi ranks 137th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).