Bangladesh vs South Sudan: Political Stability - Governance score
Political Stability - Governance score over time
- Bangladesh
- South Sudan
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports 40.9 0-100 against 40.45 0-100 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.45 0-100.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 183rd and South Sudan ranks 184th of 206 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 43.55 0-100 | 29.15 0-100 | 14.4 0-100 | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | 46.55 0-100 | 35.19 0-100 | 11.36 0-100 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance score, Bangladesh or South Sudan?
- Bangladesh, at 40.9 0-100 against 40.45 0-100 in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance score between Bangladesh and South Sudan?
- 0.45 0-100, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and South Sudan rank globally for political stability - governance score?
- Bangladesh ranks 183rd and South Sudan ranks 184th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).