Austria vs East Timor: Political Stability - Governance score
Political Stability - Governance score over time
- Austria
- East Timor
How they compare
East Timor currently reports 74.88 0-100 against 74.29 0-100 in Austria, a difference of 0.59 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 74th and East Timor ranks 72nd of 206 countries.
Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 85.61 0-100 | 54.35 0-100 | 31.26 0-100 | Austria |
| 2010s | 84.69 0-100 | 61.71 0-100 | 22.98 0-100 | Austria |
| 2020s | 77.4 0-100 | 72.45 0-100 | 4.95 0-100 | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance score, Austria or East Timor?
- East Timor, at 74.88 0-100 against 74.29 0-100 in Austria as of 2024.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance score between Austria and East Timor?
- 0.59 0-100, with East Timor ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and East Timor?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Austria and East Timor rank globally for political stability - governance score?
- Austria ranks 74th and East Timor ranks 72nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance score (0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance score is a linear transformation of the governance estimate using hypothetical worst-case and base-case countries. It is an absolute score ranging from 0-100. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) confidence intervals (lower and upper bound). The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance score (respectively the underlying governance estimate) is based. The confidence intervals include the lower and upper bound of the 90% confidence interval for the governance score. Confidence intervals are a statistical range of values that likely contain the true value (of what is being estimated).