Rwanda vs Saudi Arabia: Political Stability - Governance estimate

Rwanda
-0.0437 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Saudi Arabia
-0.0482 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Rwanda rank
109th
Saudi Arabia rank
110th

Political Stability - Governance estimate over time

  • Rwanda
  • Saudi Arabia
-2-1.5-1-0.50199620102024

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports -0.0437 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0482 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.0045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.

Rwanda ranks 109th and Saudi Arabia ranks 110th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 2 and Saudi Arabia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
1990s -2.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1998 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.96 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saudi Arabia
2000s -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6349 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Saudi Arabia
2010s -0.0785 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5167 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4382 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Rwanda
2020s 0.0598 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.335 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3949 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Rwanda or Saudi Arabia?
Rwanda, at -0.0437 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0482 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Saudi Arabia as of 2024.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Rwanda and Saudi Arabia?
0.0045 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Saudi Arabia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Rwanda and Saudi Arabia rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Rwanda ranks 109th and Saudi Arabia ranks 110th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Saudi Arabia: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/rwanda/saudi-arabia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/rwanda/saudi-arabia/">Rwanda vs Saudi Arabia: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,229 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.