New Caledonia vs New Zealand: Political Stability - Governance estimate
Political Stability - Governance estimate over time
- New Caledonia
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 7 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Caledonia ranks 27th and New Zealand ranks 24th of 207 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Caledonia | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3891 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.3 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1999 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, New Caledonia or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in New Caledonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between New Caledonia and New Zealand?
- 0.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Caledonia and New Zealand?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do New Caledonia and New Zealand rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
- New Caledonia ranks 27th and New Zealand ranks 24th of 207 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.