Mongolia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Political Stability - Governance estimate

Mongolia
0.4204 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Trinidad and Tobago
0.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Mongolia rank
81st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
84th

Political Stability - Governance estimate over time

  • Mongolia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
-0.500.51199620102024

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.4204 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.0604 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.2 times Trinidad and Tobago's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Mongolia has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 81st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 84th of 206 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5143 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2055 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3088 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mongolia
2000s 0.6973 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1013 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7986 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mongolia
2010s 0.7047 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0968 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6079 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mongolia
2020s 0.6358 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2531 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3827 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Mongolia or Trinidad and Tobago?
Mongolia, at 0.4204 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.36 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2024.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Mongolia and Trinidad and Tobago?
0.0604 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Trinidad and Tobago?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Mongolia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Mongolia ranks 81st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 84th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/mongolia/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/mongolia/trinidad-and-tobago/">Mongolia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,229 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.