Mauritius vs Slovenia: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Mauritius
0.9317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Slovenia
0.877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Mauritius rank
48th
Slovenia rank
51st

Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Mauritius
  • Slovenia
0.40.60.811.2199620102025

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.9317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.0547 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Slovenia ahead.

Mauritius ranks 48th and Slovenia ranks 51st of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9775 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.29 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3116 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovenia
2000s 0.8546 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2721 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovenia
2010s 0.8641 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9915 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1274 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovenia
2020s 0.8897 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8114 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0782 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Mauritius or Slovenia?
Mauritius, at 0.9317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovenia as of 2025.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Mauritius and Slovenia?
0.0547 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Slovenia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Mauritius and Slovenia rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Mauritius ranks 48th and Slovenia ranks 51st of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Slovenia: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/mauritius/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/mauritius/slovenia/">Mauritius vs Slovenia: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,485 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.