Luxembourg vs New Caledonia: Political Stability - Governance estimate
Political Stability - Governance estimate over time
- Luxembourg
- New Caledonia
How they compare
New Caledonia currently reports 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2018 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 29th and New Caledonia ranks 27th of 206 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | New Caledonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0035 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | New Caledonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Luxembourg or New Caledonia?
- New Caledonia, at 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Luxembourg and New Caledonia?
- 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with New Caledonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and New Caledonia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2018 to 2024.
- How do Luxembourg and New Caledonia rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
- Luxembourg ranks 29th and New Caledonia ranks 27th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.