South Korea vs Mauritius: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

South Korea
0.9174 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Mauritius
0.9317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
South Korea rank
49th
Mauritius rank
48th

Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • South Korea
  • Mauritius
0.40.60.81199620102025

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 0.9317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9174 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in South Korea, a difference of 0.0143 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritius ahead.

South Korea ranks 49th and Mauritius ranks 48th of 208 countries.

Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Korea Mauritius Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9775 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3782 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius
2000s 0.5403 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8546 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3142 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius
2010s 0.603 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8641 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2612 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius
2020s 0.8553 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8897 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0344 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, South Korea or Mauritius?
Mauritius, at 0.9317 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9174 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in South Korea as of 2025.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between South Korea and Mauritius?
0.0143 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Mauritius?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do South Korea and Mauritius rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
South Korea ranks 49th and Mauritius ranks 48th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Korea vs Mauritius: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/korea-rep/mauritius/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/korea-rep/mauritius/">South Korea vs Mauritius: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,485 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.