Grenada vs Monaco: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Grenada
- Monaco
How they compare
Monaco currently reports 1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Grenada, a difference of 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 23 years both countries report, Monaco has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 22nd and Monaco ranks 20th of 208 countries.
Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9319 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5235 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Monaco |
| 2010s | 0.6187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Monaco |
| 2020s | 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1176 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Monaco |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Grenada or Monaco?
- Monaco, at 1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Grenada as of 2025.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Grenada and Monaco?
- 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Monaco ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Monaco?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2025.
- How do Grenada and Monaco rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
- Grenada ranks 22nd and Monaco ranks 20th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.