Ghana vs Maldives: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Ghana
0.0877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Maldives
0.078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Ghana rank
111th
Maldives rank
113th

Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Ghana
  • Maldives
-0.500.51199620102025

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 0.0877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Maldives, a difference of 0.0097 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Maldives's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Maldives ahead.

Ghana ranks 111th and Maldives ranks 113th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Maldives in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Maldives Difference Ahead
1990s -0.5977 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.71 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Maldives
2000s -0.132 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6197 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Maldives
2010s -0.0148 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0498 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0349 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Ghana
2020s -0.0221 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.171 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1931 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Maldives

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Ghana or Maldives?
Ghana, at 0.0877 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Maldives as of 2025.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Ghana and Maldives?
0.0097 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Maldives?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Ghana and Maldives rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Ghana ranks 111th and Maldives ranks 113th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Maldives: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/ghana/maldives/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/ghana/maldives/">Ghana vs Maldives: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,485 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.