Equatorial Guinea vs United States of America: Political Stability - Governance estimate

Equatorial Guinea
-0.1409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
United States of America
-0.0951 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
117th
United States of America rank
114th

Political Stability - Governance estimate over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • United States of America
-0.500.51199620102024

How they compare

United States of America currently reports -0.0951 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0458 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Across all 26 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 117th and United States of America ranks 114th of 206 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea United States of America Difference Ahead
1990s -0.1988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9471 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 United States of America
2000s -0.1707 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.453 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6237 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 United States of America
2010s -0.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4558 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7358 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 United States of America
2020s -0.2957 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1448 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1509 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Equatorial Guinea or United States of America?
United States of America, at -0.0951 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1409 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Equatorial Guinea and United States of America?
0.0458 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and United States of America?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and United States of America rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 117th and United States of America ranks 114th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs United States of America: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/equatorial-guinea/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/equatorial-guinea/united-states/">Equatorial Guinea vs United States of America: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,229 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.