Equatorial Guinea vs Moldova: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Equatorial Guinea
-0.1523 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Moldova
-0.1123 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
126th
Moldova rank
124th

Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Moldova
-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2-00.2199620102025

How they compare

Moldova currently reports -0.1123 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1523 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Moldova ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 126th and Moldova ranks 124th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 1 and Moldova in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s -0.274 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0301 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2438 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Moldova
2000s -0.2208 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2389 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.018 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Equatorial Guinea
2010s -0.3124 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0679 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2445 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Moldova
2020s -0.2938 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1908 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1031 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Equatorial Guinea or Moldova?
Moldova, at -0.1123 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1523 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Equatorial Guinea and Moldova?
0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Moldova?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Moldova rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 126th and Moldova ranks 124th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Moldova: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 14 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/equatorial-guinea/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/equatorial-guinea/moldova/">Equatorial Guinea vs Moldova: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,485 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.