Ecuador vs Mauritania: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Ecuador
-0.6417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Mauritania
-0.6544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Ecuador rank
165th
Mauritania rank
166th

Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mauritania
-1.2-1-0.75-0.5-0.250199620102025

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports -0.6417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0127 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritania ahead.

Ecuador ranks 165th and Mauritania ranks 166th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Mauritania Difference Ahead
1990s -0.6772 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0338 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7111 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2000s -0.7723 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2592 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5131 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2010s -0.3157 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8769 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5612 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Ecuador
2020s -0.3548 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5436 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1888 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Ecuador or Mauritania?
Ecuador, at -0.6417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.6544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritania as of 2025.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Ecuador and Mauritania?
0.0127 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mauritania?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Ecuador and Mauritania rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Ecuador ranks 165th and Mauritania ranks 166th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Mauritania: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/ecuador/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/ecuador/mauritania/">Ecuador vs Mauritania: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,485 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.