Croatia vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Political Stability - Governance estimate

Croatia
0.5814 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Lao People's Democratic Republic
0.5577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Croatia rank
68th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
69th

Political Stability - Governance estimate over time

  • Croatia
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
-1-0.500.51199620102024

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 0.5814 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.0237 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.

Croatia ranks 68th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 69th of 206 countries.

Croatia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
1990s -0.0881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1185 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0304 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Croatia
2000s 0.6379 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Croatia
2010s 0.6768 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1612 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5155 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Croatia
2020s 0.6562 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6255 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0307 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Croatia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Croatia or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Croatia, at 0.5814 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.5577 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Croatia and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
0.0237 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Croatia and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Croatia ranks 68th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 69th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/croatia/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/croatia/lao-pdr/">Croatia vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,229 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.