Chile vs Rwanda: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Chile
0.1706 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Rwanda
0.122 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Chile rank
102nd
Rwanda rank
105th

Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Chile
  • Rwanda
-2-101199620102025

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.1706 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.122 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.4 times Rwanda's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 102nd and Rwanda ranks 105th of 208 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Rwanda Difference Ahead
1990s 0.444 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -2.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 2.61 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2000s 0.8057 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.81 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2010s 0.6165 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0676 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6841 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile
2020s 0.1439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0559 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.088 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Chile or Rwanda?
Chile, at 0.1706 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.122 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Rwanda as of 2025.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Chile and Rwanda?
0.0486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Rwanda?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Chile and Rwanda rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Chile ranks 102nd and Rwanda ranks 105th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Rwanda: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/chile/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/chile/rwanda/">Chile vs Rwanda: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,485 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.