Central African Republic vs Libya: Political Stability - Governance estimate

Central African Republic
-1.83 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Libya
-1.9 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Central African Republic rank
191st
Libya rank
194th

Political Stability - Governance estimate over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Libya
-2-101199620102024

How they compare

Central African Republic currently reports -1.83 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.9 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Libya, a difference of 0.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Libya ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 191st and Libya ranks 194th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 2 and Libya in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Libya Difference Ahead
1990s -1.86 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.744 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Libya
2000s -1.66 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1395 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Libya
2010s -1.9 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.92 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0207 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic
2020s -2.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -2.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0527 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Central African Republic or Libya?
Central African Republic, at -1.83 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.9 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Libya as of 2024.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Central African Republic and Libya?
0.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Central African Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Libya?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Central African Republic and Libya rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Central African Republic ranks 191st and Libya ranks 194th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Libya: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/central-african-republic/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/central-african-republic/libya/">Central African Republic vs Libya: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,229 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.