Cambodia vs North Macedonia: Political Stability - Governance estimate

Cambodia
0.1284 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
North Macedonia
0.1558 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Cambodia rank
97th
North Macedonia rank
95th

Political Stability - Governance estimate over time

  • Cambodia
  • North Macedonia
-1.5-1-0.500.5199620102024

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 0.1558 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1284 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cambodia, a difference of 0.0274 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.2 times Cambodia's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 97th and North Macedonia ranks 95th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1990s -1.34 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2783 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 North Macedonia
2000s -0.7214 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7235 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0021 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cambodia
2010s -0.2411 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2602 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0191 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cambodia
2020s -0.0399 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.175 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2149 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Cambodia or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 0.1558 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1284 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cambodia as of 2024.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Cambodia and North Macedonia?
0.0274 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and North Macedonia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Cambodia and North Macedonia rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Cambodia ranks 97th and North Macedonia ranks 95th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs North Macedonia: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cambodia/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cambodia/north-macedonia/">Cambodia vs North Macedonia: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,229 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.