Cape Verde vs South Korea: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Cape Verde
0.8588 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
South Korea
0.9174 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Cape Verde rank
52nd
South Korea rank
49th

Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Cape Verde
  • South Korea
0.40.60.811.2199620102025

How they compare

South Korea currently reports 0.9174 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8588 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.0586 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes South Korea's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 52nd and South Korea ranks 49th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 3 and South Korea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde South Korea Difference Ahead
1990s 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5992 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5079 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cape Verde
2000s 0.9327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5403 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3923 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cape Verde
2010s 0.8229 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.603 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Cape Verde
2020s 0.8411 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8553 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0142 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 South Korea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Cape Verde or South Korea?
South Korea, at 0.9174 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8588 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Cape Verde as of 2025.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Cape Verde and South Korea?
0.0586 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with South Korea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and South Korea?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Cape Verde and South Korea rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Cape Verde ranks 52nd and South Korea ranks 49th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs South Korea: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cabo-verde/korea-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/cabo-verde/korea-rep/">Cape Verde vs South Korea: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,485 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.