Burkina Faso vs Libya: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Burkina Faso
-1.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Libya
-1.84 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Burkina Faso rank
195th
Libya rank
196th

Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Libya
-2-10199620102025

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports -1.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.84 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Libya, a difference of 0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Burkina Faso ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 195th and Libya ranks 196th of 208 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 3 and Libya in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Libya Difference Ahead
1990s -0.0958 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.809 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7131 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Burkina Faso
2000s 0.0395 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.106 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0665 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Libya
2010s -0.7797 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.92 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Burkina Faso
2020s -1.73 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -2.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3005 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Burkina Faso or Libya?
Burkina Faso, at -1.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.84 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Libya as of 2025.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Burkina Faso and Libya?
0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Libya?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Burkina Faso and Libya rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Burkina Faso ranks 195th and Libya ranks 196th of 208 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Libya: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/burkina-faso/libya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/burkina-faso/libya/">Burkina Faso vs Libya: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 5,485 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.