Botswana vs Guam: Political Stability - Governance estimate
Political Stability - Governance estimate over time
- Botswana
- Guam
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9927 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Guam, a difference of 0.0373 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Botswana has been ahead every year.
Botswana ranks 34th and Guam ranks 36th of 206 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Guam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5186 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6544 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Botswana |
| 2010s | 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7747 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3605 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Botswana |
| 2020s | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9964 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0567 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Botswana or Guam?
- Botswana, at 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9927 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Guam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Botswana and Guam?
- 0.0373 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Guam?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and Guam rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
- Botswana ranks 34th and Guam ranks 36th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.