Botswana vs French Polynesia: Political Stability - Governance estimate
Political Stability - Governance estimate over time
- Botswana
- French Polynesia
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in French Polynesia, a difference of 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2019 it was Botswana ahead.
Botswana ranks 34th and French Polynesia ranks 35th of 206 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | French Polynesia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9033 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2506 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Botswana |
| 2020s | 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0295 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Botswana or French Polynesia?
- Botswana, at 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in French Polynesia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Botswana and French Polynesia?
- 0 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and French Polynesia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do Botswana and French Polynesia rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
- Botswana ranks 34th and French Polynesia ranks 35th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.