Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Mauritania: Political Stability - Governance estimate

Bolivia, Plurinational State of
-0.546 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Mauritania
-0.5596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
148th
Mauritania rank
150th

Political Stability - Governance estimate over time

  • Bolivia, Plurinational State of
  • Mauritania
-1-0.50199620102024

How they compare

Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports -0.546 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0136 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritania ahead.

Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 148th and Mauritania ranks 150th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bolivia, Plurinational State of averaged higher in 2 and Mauritania in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia, Plurinational State of Mauritania Difference Ahead
1990s -0.2037 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0271 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2308 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2000s -0.5671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.2508 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3163 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2010s -0.3048 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8659 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bolivia, Plurinational State of
2020s -0.3356 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5023 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1667 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bolivia, Plurinational State of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Mauritania?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at -0.546 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.5596 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritania as of 2024.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Mauritania?
0.0136 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Mauritania?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Mauritania rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 148th and Mauritania ranks 150th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Mauritania: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bolivia/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bolivia/mauritania/">Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Mauritania: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,229 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.