Bangladesh vs South Sudan: Political Stability - Governance estimate
Political Stability - Governance estimate over time
- Bangladesh
- South Sudan
How they compare
Bangladesh currently reports -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Bangladesh has been ahead every year.
Bangladesh ranks 183rd and South Sudan ranks 184th of 206 countries.
Bangladesh has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bangladesh | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | -1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8433 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Bangladesh |
| 2020s | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.8 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6648 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Bangladesh |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Bangladesh or South Sudan?
- Bangladesh, at -1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Bangladesh and South Sudan?
- 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bangladesh ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and South Sudan?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2024.
- How do Bangladesh and South Sudan rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
- Bangladesh ranks 183rd and South Sudan ranks 184th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.