Bahrain vs Kosovo: Political Stability - Governance estimate
Political Stability - Governance estimate over time
- Bahrain
- Kosovo
How they compare
Bahrain currently reports -0.2759 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3219 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kosovo, a difference of 0.046 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bahrain ahead.
Bahrain ranks 129th and Kosovo ranks 132nd of 206 countries.
Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahrain | Kosovo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0061 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2262 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2201 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kosovo |
| 2010s | -0.9632 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4611 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.5022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kosovo |
| 2020s | -0.472 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1194 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3525 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Bahrain or Kosovo?
- Bahrain, at -0.2759 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.3219 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Kosovo as of 2024.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Bahrain and Kosovo?
- 0.046 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bahrain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahrain and Kosovo?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Bahrain and Kosovo rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
- Bahrain ranks 129th and Kosovo ranks 132nd of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.