Aruba vs Monaco: Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- Aruba
- Monaco
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco, a difference of 0.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 22 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Monaco ahead.
Aruba ranks 18th and Monaco ranks 20th of 208 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.9263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3236 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 1.28 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1088 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
| 2020s | 1.33 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0586 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Aruba or Monaco?
- Aruba, at 1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Monaco as of 2025.
- What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Aruba and Monaco?
- 0.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Monaco?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2025.
- How do Aruba and Monaco rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
- Aruba ranks 18th and Monaco ranks 20th of 208 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.