Antigua and Barbuda vs Macao: Political Stability - Governance estimate

Antigua and Barbuda
1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Macao
1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Antigua and Barbuda rank
28th
Macao rank
30th

Political Stability - Governance estimate over time

  • Antigua and Barbuda
  • Macao
0.250.50.7511.2199620102024

How they compare

Antigua and Barbuda currently reports 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Macao, a difference of 0.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Antigua and Barbuda ahead.

Antigua and Barbuda ranks 28th and Macao ranks 30th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Antigua and Barbuda averaged higher in 3 and Macao in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Antigua and Barbuda Macao Difference Ahead
1990s 0.707 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1634 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5436 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Antigua and Barbuda
2000s 0.7808 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.676 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1048 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Antigua and Barbuda
2010s 0.8642 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.899 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0348 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Macao
2020s 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0067 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Antigua and Barbuda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher political stability - governance estimate, Antigua and Barbuda or Macao?
Antigua and Barbuda, at 1.07 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.05 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Macao as of 2024.
What is the difference in political stability - governance estimate between Antigua and Barbuda and Macao?
0.02 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Antigua and Barbuda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Antigua and Barbuda and Macao?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Antigua and Barbuda and Macao rank globally for political stability - governance estimate?
Antigua and Barbuda ranks 28th and Macao ranks 30th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Antigua and Barbuda vs Macao: Political Stability - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/antigua-and-barbuda/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/political-stability-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/antigua-and-barbuda/macao-sar-china/">Antigua and Barbuda vs Macao: Political Stability - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Political Stability - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,229 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Political Stability (PV) captures perceptions of the extent to which political power and governance are secure from destabilization, and of the likelihood that authority will be challenged or altered through violent, coercive, or unconstitutional means. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.