Sierra Leone vs Tajikistan: Democracy

Sierra Leone
1
in 2025
Tajikistan
1
in 2025
Sierra Leone rank
87th
Tajikistan rank
87th

Democracy over time

  • Sierra Leone
  • Tajikistan
00.511.52186819462025

How they compare

Sierra Leone currently reports 1 against 1 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Tajikistan ahead.

Sierra Leone ranks 87th and Tajikistan ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Sierra Leone averaged higher in 6 and Tajikistan in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Sierra Leone Tajikistan Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0.1 0.1 Tajikistan
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0.6 0 0.6 Sierra Leone
1970s 0.7 0 0.7 Sierra Leone
1980s 1 0 1 Sierra Leone
1990s 0.3 1 0.7 Tajikistan
2000s 1.5 1 0.5 Sierra Leone
2010s 2 1 1 Sierra Leone
2020s 1.5 1 0.5 Sierra Leone

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher democracy, Sierra Leone or Tajikistan?
Sierra Leone, at 1 against 1 in Tajikistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in democracy between Sierra Leone and Tajikistan?
0, with Sierra Leone ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sierra Leone and Tajikistan?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Sierra Leone and Tajikistan rank globally for democracy?
Sierra Leone ranks 87th and Tajikistan ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Democracy
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,594 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Identifies the political regime of a country by distinguishing between closed autocracies, electoral autocracies, electoral democracies, and liberal democracies.